Farrow and Washburn
3
Effects on HRV and Anxiety Levels
Several other articles consider the effects of forest bath-
ing/forest therapy on anxiety-tension using The Profile
of Mood States (POMS) subscale scores and the seman-
tic differential (SD) method.
One such study measured changes in autonomic ner-
vous system activity and emotions after a 2-hour forest
bathing program in 128 middle-aged and elderly partic-
ipants. Physiological measurements were taken; pulse
rate, blood pressure, HRV, and POMS subscale scores
were recorded.
The POMS “subscale scores for ‘tension-anxiety’,
‘anger-hostility’, ‘fatigue-inertia’, ‘depression-dejection’,
and ‘confusion-bewilderment’ were significantly lower,
whereas the positive mood subscale score of ‘vigor-activ-
ity’ was higher.”11 In addition, participants reported sig-
nificantly lower levels of anxiety using the Spielberger
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. This study determined
that a forest bathing program causes significantly
lower pulse rate, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure
after a 2-hour walk. In addition, reduced tension, anger,
fatigue, depression, confusion, anxiety and improved
positive emotions were reported. Surprisingly, sympa-
thetic and parasympathetic nerve activity measures
revealed no significant changes. In summary, a 2-hour
forest bathing program appears to yield physiological
and psychological benefits with middle-aged and elderly
individuals.
In another study, 20 Japanese men were screened and
10 were selected for 2 groups of 5. Each participant had
been diagnosed with stage 1 hypertension (having a sys-
tolic 140–159 mm Hg or diastolic 90–99 mm Hg) and 5
had stage 2 hypertension (having a systolic 160–179 mm
Hg or diastolic 100–109 mm Hg). Each group alternated
walking in a forest setting for 17 minutes one day fol-
lowed by walking for 17 minutes in an urban setting the
next day. Heart rate and HRV were used to quantify
autonomic nervous system responses. Subjects complet-
ed 2 questionnaires measuring mood states using the
modified SD method referencing 3 pairs of adjectives
on 13 scales: “comfortable to uncomfortable,” “relaxed
to awakening,” and “natural to artificial.” A modified
30-question POMS was set for 6 subscales: “tension-
anxiety,” “depression,” “anger-hostility,” “fatigue,”
“confusion,” and “vigor.”
Results indicated that walking in a forest elicited both
physiological and psychological relaxation for middle-
aged individuals with hypertension; there was a signifi-
cant increase in parasympathetic nerve activity and a
significant decrease in heart rate. In addition, a signifi-
cant increase in “comfortable,” “relaxed,” and “natural”
mood, and reduced “tension-anxiety,” “depression,”
“anger-hostility,” “fatigue,” “confusion,” and “vigor”
were reported. The authors point out this study’s
limitations, including an inability to generalize these
results for the female population and for people of vary-
ing ages, and thus a more comprehensive study is rec-
ommended in the future.12
A third article investigated the influence of forest
therapy on cardiovascular effects. “Forty-eight young
adult males participated in the two-day field research”13
comparing physiological and psychological changes
during forest walking and urban walking. Changes in
HRV, heart rate, and blood pressure were measured
and questionnaires recorded changes in mood states
following walking. Subjective measures such as
“comfortable-uncomfortable,” “natural-artificial,” and
“soothed-aroused” were recorded using a 13-scale SD
method. The modified 30-question version of the
POMS questionnaire was used to measure mood.
Anxiety was measured using the Spielberger State-Trait
Anxiety Inventory questionnaire. Each group walked for
14 minutes in each environment.
The study found forest walking significantly increased
In(HF) values and significantly decreased In(LF/HF)
values compared to urban walking. Heart rate during
forest walking was significantly lower than the urban
walking control group. Reported subjective measures
indicated that “negative mood states and anxiety levels
decreased significantly by forest walking compared with
urban walking.”12 “Walking in a forest environment
may promote cardiovascular relaxation by facilitating
the parasympathetic nervous system. In addition,
forest therapy may be effective in reducing negative psy-
chological symptoms.”13
Another study examined the effects of walking in a
forest on HRV and mood states, comparing natural set-
tings to city environments. Over the course of 2 years, 24
field experiments were done with 280 Japanese male par-
ticipants to compare the findings regarding the physio-
logical effects of forest walking with corresponding
results from previous research. Each experiment was
comprised of 12 subjects divided into 2 groups of 6.
One group was assigned to walk in a city while the alter-
nate group walked in a forest environment. Each group
walked approximately 14 minutes. On the following day,
the groups alternated settings. Blood pressure, heart
rate, HRV, and salivary cortisol levels were recorded
prior to and following each walk. All cardiac data
were collected with a portable electrocardiograph, and
both HF and low frequency (LF) power level compo-
nents were calculated each minute during walking.
Psychological status was measured using the POMS
recording 6 dimensions of mood: tension-anxiety,
depression-dejection, anger-hostility, fatigue, confusion,
and vigor.
Results indicated reduced salivary cortisol levels after
walking or viewing natural environments, with a 2.4%
decrease when walking is compared to viewing.