:: Biblioteca Digital de Ecopsicologia (BDE)

Ecological/Nature-Assisted Arts Therapies and the Paradigm Change

Creative Arts Educ Ther (2021) 7(1):34–45

DOI: 10.15212/CAET/2021/7/2

Ecological/Nature-Assisted Arts Therapies

and the Paradigm Change

生态/自然辅助艺术疗法与范式转变

Alexander Kopytin

Saint Petersburg Academy of Postgraduate Pedagogical Education, Russia

Abstract

This article examines the key presumptions and theoretical foundation of nature-assisted eco-

logical creative arts therapies, a branch of contemporary ecotherapy. It is considered from the

perspective of the eco-human multidisciplinary approach that defines the human being in rela-

tion to the living environment, and seeks to reveal one’s own subjectivity and to shape the world

in order to fulfill one’s needs and to take care of the well-being of the environment. The multi-

faceted role of the arts in providing meaningful human connection to nature are explained. This

helps to understand nature-assisted creative arts therapies as providing both public and environ-

mental health and establishing more harmonious relations of humans with nature.

Keywords: nature-assisted/ecological arts therapies, the eco-human approach, ecopsychology, ecotherapy,

ecopoiesis, poiesis

摘要

本文探讨了自然辅助生态创意艺术疗法（当代生态疗法的一个分支）的关键假设和理论基

础。从生态人类多学科方法的观点，该方法定义了人类与生活环境的关系，并试图揭示自

身己的主观性，并塑造世界以为了满足自己的需求，同时也并照顾好环境。文中解释了艺

术在提供有意义的人类与自然联系方面的多重作用。这有助于理解大自然辅助的创意艺术

疗法，既可以提供公共健康，也可以提供环境健康，并建立人与自然之间更和谐的关系。

关键词: 自然辅助/生态艺术疗法，生态人文的方法，生态心理学，生态疗法，创生态，创制（制作）

Challenges: The Crisis of Ecology and the Humanities

The global environmental crisis has become a reality. Its transition into an ecological

catastrophe is a matter of time during which humankind can either take certain steps to

prevent it or remain on the same track of uncontrolled exploitation of the earth’s natural

resources. Attempts are being made to solve the global environmental crisis in various

ways, in particular by implementing a sustainable development model that, among

other things, assumes the need for technological reorganization, as well as introducing

environmental education to support the development of environmental awareness.

The environmental crisis is taking place against the backdrop of many complex

societal issues, demonstrating the fragility of the existing order in which, due to

globalization, everything is dependent upon everything else. From the perspective of

Creative Arts in Education and Therapy – Eastern and Western Perspectives – Vol. 7, Issue 1, August 2021.

Ecological/Nature-Assisted Arts Therapies and the Paradigm Change 35

ecological theory, this is a relatively stable system but a system without resilience. The

crisis in the humanities appears to be at the core of the current global situation.

The coronavirus pandemic and its wide-ranging social, psychological, and

economic impact invite us to search for answers to these questions from an integrative

multicultural and multi-professional perspective, incorporating not only medical,

psychological, and pedagogical knowledge, but also ecology, the humanities, the arts,

and cultural perspectives. Global civilization appears to be very fragile in this situation

in which the virus has rapidly brought greater entropy to the world. Yet at the same time

human beings are revealing their resilience, both in terms of the biomedical and social

measures taken in response to the virus, as well as people’s creative responses.

Nature and culture work as autonomous but synergetic systems—both are parts of

the whole system of life on this planet. Both of them need to be engaged in order to

empower human beings to cope emotionally and restore themselves. I am referring here

to human resilience, rooted in both the cultural and natural realms with their capacity

for creation, which enables us and the earth to recover. Realizing our creative, poietic

capacity together with the more-than-human world, we support an inner and outer

ecology.

Nature-assisted creative arts therapies arose from the spirit of these ideas in order

to bring together the arts therapies and the ecological perspective into their original

interconnection on the basis of a renewed understanding of the role of the arts, nature,

and the human sciences in the life of the planet.

Defining Nature-Assisted/Ecological Creative Arts Therapies

The emergence of nature-assisted or ecological arts therapies marks a decisive moment

in the development of our profession. Such arts therapies mean something more than

just a set of innovative creative activities and ideas that can be implemented as a part

of already established therapeutic approaches; they strive to form a new platform for

empirical forms of therapeutic and health-promoting work, supported by a constellation

of distinct theoretical ideas. Nature-assisted arts therapies bring the arts and nature

together to provide beneficial effects for both the human and nonhuman worlds.

Environmental psychology, ecopsychology, environmental education, deep ecology,

the environmental arts, ecological arts therapies, some forms of social activism as well

as some established scientific fields all belong to the environmental movement. This

movement challenges the basic foundations of our current civilization and can even be

considered as related to a paradigm shift, since paradigms, according to Kuhn (1962),

are not simply theories but the entire worldview in which theories exist, and all of the

implications that come with it. A significant part of the environmental movement is

concerned with the need for radical change in personal beliefs, and the need for ideas

about complex systems and organizations to replace former ways of thinking about and

organizing social life and human psychology.

Nature-assisted arts therapies and other branches of the ecological movement aligned

to the need for a paradigm shift bring a new perspective to our understanding of health

and pathology and new ways to address personal and collective mental distress, since

Alexander Kopytin

at their most ambitious they seek to redefine mental health within an environmental

context and invite us to reexamine the human psyche as an integral part of the web of

nature.

Nature-assisted or ecological arts therapies are also based on the new understanding

of the role of the arts in supporting public and environmental health and establishing

more harmonious relations between humans and nature. These therapies focus on the

therapeutic potential of creative and expressive processes to heal and develop our

relationships with each other and the living environment.

The spectrum of expressive forms that are used to provide channels for creative

responses in the nature-assisted or ecological arts therapies is broad and includes visual

art, drama, rituals, music, dance and movement, creative writing as well as practices

that integrate the expressive arts and interactions with animals and plants, wilderness

journeys, contemplative presence in nature, and so on. Nature-assisted or ecological

arts therapies, ecotherapy, environmental philosophy, environmental education, and

contemporary environmental arts all support the emerging eco-human approach and the

growing field of constructive innovations that can be applied in the fields of education,

medicine, and in the wider social context, thereby taking action in response to the

environmental crisis and enabling a more harmonious coevolution of human beings and

the more-than-human world.

Creative activities in nature-assisted arts therapies can involve experiences of

becoming embedded in the ecosystem and empathic attuning to various environmental

phenomena and forms of life. This process has the potential to allow us to actualize

and bring to the conscious mind certain aspects of the human experience, in particular

those related to our biological history and our “ecological unconscious,” according to

Theodore Roszak (2001). The results of this process include improved health, well-

being, and support for our perception of ourselves as ecological subjects, our eco-

identity (Næss, 1989, 2003).

The central and unique characteristics of nature-assisted or ecological arts therapies

can be summarized as follows. They usually include either outdoor or indoor activities

that involve direct interaction with the natural world or natural materials and often lead

to the perception of the environment and its inhabitants as other forms of life, which are

then engaged with ethically. The activities can include series of exercises that awaken

sensory awareness through relaxation, breathing, exploratory mindful walks, body

scanning, journaling, and other tasks that help to develop receptivity and diffuse and

focus attention and embodiment in the living environment.

Nature-assisted arts therapies aim to achieve multiple therapeutic goals that embrace

both the micro and macro levels. They not only deal with individual needs and health

issues but with environmental issues too. How can we address these issues that are

usually ignored in most conventional therapies?

As arts therapists we can address these issues in different ways. We can offer our

clients the possibility to engage in creative non-pragmatic environmental activities, to

learn how to see and create beauty around themselves, and how to develop effective

self-regulatory skills and coping strategies that can be used both in therapy and in

everyday life to improve and promote their health and well-being.

Ecological/Nature-Assisted Arts Therapies and the Paradigm Change 37

We can also help our clients enrich their ecological knowledge and develop their

ecological consciousness and thus decrease their possible destructive impact on the

natural environment and prevent risks of various physical and mental issues as a result

of unsustainable ways of living and pathogenic environmental factors. We can do this,

in particular, through waste reduction and an environmentally conscious attitude to our

use of materials.

Nature-assisted arts therapies recognize that people have the fundamental need and

right to live in a “healthy,” beautiful, and unthreatened environment, and that such a

need and right must be fulfilled. According to the tenets of sustainable development, the

balance between economic growth, care for the environment, and social well-being are

interconnected and must be guaranteed.

Unfortunately, arts therapists are not trained in the environmental paradigm and

they do not learn how to address these issues both on theoretical and practical levels.

Therefore, special modules for arts therapists during their training and professional work

and even a specialization in the field of nature-assisted or ecological arts therapies must

be developed so that our professional field can contribute to human and environmental

health and well-being to a greater degree.

The Eco-human Approach as a New Multi-professional Theoretical

Framework Defining Human Relationships to the Environment

While considering the postulates and basic theoretical ideas that could be relevant

for the emerging field of nature-assisted or ecological arts therapies, the eco-human

multidisciplinary approach, which is formed in a situation of growing environmental

crisis and a crisis in the humanities, appears to be one of the options.

The eco-human approach recognizes that the key problem of the humanities—the

problem of understanding ourselves as “environmental subjects”—cannot be solved

within the framework of Cartesian science that separates a person (the subject) from the

external world of objects. The eco-human approach posits that the subject is considered

in relation to the living environment, and seeks to reveal the subjectivity of the natural

world as well as humans’ ability to shape the world in order to fulfill their needs and

take care of the well-being of the environment. We can recognize that ecology in the

broad sense of the term, as a worldview, needs a new conception of the human as much

as the modern humanities need ecology and the environmental perspective.

According to the current definition of the eco-human approach (Kopytin, 2020;

Levine, 2020), the individual is considered in relation to the living environment, and

seeks to reveal one’s own subjectivity and to shape the world in order to fulfill one’s needs

and take care of the well-being of the environment. The eco-human approach is aimed

at overcoming the environmental crisis and the crisis in the humanities by strengthening

the links of the humanities with environmental knowledge and ecology. This implies the

task of developing ecological consciousness and sustainable lifestyles that characterize

“environmental subjects,” individuals with an “ecological identity” (Næss, 1989, 2003).

According to Arne Næss, the main cause of the ecological crisis is the psychological

organization of a personality that was formed on the wave of industrialization and

Alexander Kopytin

scientism. Accordingly, in order to overcome the environmental crisis, it is necessary

to form a different psychological organization of the personality, based on the concept

of environmental identity—eco-identity. This concept of eco-identity allows us to

recognize and further develop theories that help (a) to exemplify a more ecological,

or systems, view of the person, (b) offer an understanding of how an expanded self-

concept might affect the functioning of individuals and their surrounding environment,

and (c) suggest how self-constructs might be changed.

This approach postulates a poietic nature (ancient Greek word—“ποιέω”—I create;

“ποίησις”—creativity) of humans, that is “…their ability to shape the world around

themselves and that humans exist in the mode of possibility; they can choose to shape

the world and themselves in a way that is not yet actual but that is contained potentially

in what is already given” (Levine, 1992, p.23). Poiesis is related to love, Eros. From the

perspective of the eco-human approach, a person’s ability to love can be represented

as a property of human beings in their acts of cocreation with nature. Poiesis is an old

philosophical concept that was initially explained by Plato and further developed by

others.

According to Levine (1992, 2020), poiesis

the basic capacity…to shape their worlds. The human being is distinct from

other creatures in that it is not pre-adapted to a particular environment.

Instead it has the ability to build radically different worlds suitable (or not)

to life in a wide diversity of surroundings. In building its world, the human

shapes the environment, and as it does so, it shapes itself. World building is

self-building (Levine, 1992, p. 23–24).

Based on the idea of poiesis, the concept of ecopoiesis (from the Greek words. “Oἶκος”—

home, housing, and ποίησι—creativity) as an important part of the eco-human approach,

supporting the idea of humans as “environmental subjects,” is introduced (Kopytin,

2020; Levine, 2020). This concept is designed to provide the foundations necessary to

consider humans in their relations with the living environment as willing and able to

take care of their “earthly home,” guided not only by their needs but also by the desire

to maintain biodiversity and ecological balance.

Ecopoiesis is a quality and mechanism of the coevolution of the human being and

nature, a conscious and responsible cocreation of humankind with the natural world,

based on its physical, emotional, and spiritual connection with it. Through ecopoiesis,

the human being, together with nature and as part of it continues, learns and generates

not only itself and its meanings but also various forms and meanings of earthly life.

Creative acts as perceived from the ecopoiesis perspective are rooted not so much in

the need of individual creative self-expression in the traditional sense of this word, but

in the motivation to support and serve nature and life and achieve nonduality, a balance

between natural and cultural milieu by embracing the transpersonal center of being.

Ecopoiesis cannot be achieved without love for the Earth and for the beings that inhabit

it, including our own selves.

Ecopoiesis as a creative environmental function and one of the functions of eco-

identity is expressed through one’s initiatives to care for and respect the environment,

Ecological/Nature-Assisted Arts Therapies and the Paradigm Change 39

and to see ecosystems and local green spaces as a source of health and well-being

for oneself and others who belong to both human and beyond the human worlds.

Doing something meaningful and healing both for ourselves and the world around,

together with nature, according to the ecopoietic function of the human being, means

various things, such as gardening, animal encounters, simply spending more time in

ecologically healthy settings, making love in and with nature, or more actively working

on maintaining and restoring eco-health, and can be regarded as types of environmental

action that are characteristic of a person with an established eco-identity.

Ecopoietic environmental function is expressed through one’s initiatives to care

for and respect the environment and to see local green spaces as a source of health and

well-being for oneself and others who belong to both human and more-than-human

worlds. Eco-identity with its ecopoietic function often makes one socio-politically

active, able to engage further in eco-health promotion and become an agent of change

in educative, public health, and environmental spheres. As a constructive component

of the eco-humanities, eco-human technologies were identified and defined as methods

of transforming the human being with its attitude to the environment and itself. Eco-

human technologies can be used in the field of pedagogy, psychology, medicine, and

other fields, in a wide cultural domain, forming environmental awareness and values,

contributing to preserving and developing the human and natural resources of the planet

(Kopytin, 2020).

The notion of eco-identity in the framework of the eco-human approach assumes a

greater significance as related to the human ability to do arts as meaningful environmental

action and even as a form of cocreation, in which human beings can participate, together

with other living forms that establish a wider “community of subjects.” Doing arts

in and with nature, together with many other activities typical for ecotherapy, such

as gardening, animal encounters, simply spending more time in ecologically healthy

settings, or more actively working on maintaining and restoring eco-health, can be

regarded as types of environmental action with a strong self-regulating function related

to coping skills and adaptivity.

Creative environmental function, as one of the core functions of eco-identity, is

expressed through one’s initiatives to care for and respect the environment and to see

local green spaces as a source of health and well-being for oneself and others who

belong to both human and more-than-human worlds. Eco-identity often makes one

socio-politically active, able to engage further in eco-health promotion and become an

agent of change in educative, public health, and environmental spheres.

The Role of the Arts in Providing Meaningful Human Connection

to Nature

The visual and performing arts as well as other forms of organized and meaningful

human expression existed in human history long before civilized human mind came to

an understanding of creative acts as a form of prevailingly individualistic activity. The

wider, environmental perception of the arts can be found both in many world traditions

especially in those characterized “by ideas about the interconnectedness of all things,

Alexander Kopytin

perpetual movement, impermanence, and how small and humble acts generate larger

changes in the world” (McNiff, 2015, p.12). Such perception of the arts is also implied

in the contemporary environmental movement and represents the perennial need of

human beings to keep their intrinsic connection with the natural world around.

Considerable similarity between modern environmental and ecopsychological

understanding of the arts and world traditions, in particular those connected to Eastern

cultures, with their environmental practices supporting mind–body–spirit integration,

can be found. Both contemporary ecotherapy and Eastern cultural traditions can be

characterized in their perception of the arts as implying the vital function of supporting

healthy bonds with nature. According to such perception of the arts, natural environments

and forms can be highly attractive to humans not only due to their practical value but

also to their aesthetic, cognitive, and spiritual meaning.

One of the examples of such function of the arts in Eastern cultural traditions is

ikebana:

“Similar to the other practices in Japan like calligraphy, tea ceremony,

and Haiku, which have been valued in Zen Buddhism as a means of self-

cultivation, Ikebana is seen as one way of body–mind training. Immersion in

the physical practice of this art can lead to both psychological and spiritual

emptiness (no-self), which is thought to be the source of skillful action and

the basis for empathetic and ethical behavior.” (Kopytin et al., 2019, p.97).

The role of the arts, in the context of creative/expressive arts therapies, in providing

meaningful human connection to nature should be emphasized. The arts possess their

own means of solving the environmental and human issues that face us. The spectrum

of ways to engage with nature through the arts is wide and involves the participant

engaging in different roles: from objective observer to active interventionist. The

functions of the arts that can be relevant for the goals of ecological arts therapies can be

outlined as follows:

The arts support meaningful action leading to changed perception of the natural

environment. Study of the cultural history of humankind helps us to recognize that

doing arts brings new meaning to human relations with nature; raise consciousness of

our place in the natural world and our interdependence; encourage people to transcend

their own personal problems and develop a sense of being part of a bigger whole, thus

allowing the spiritual awareness of a relationship with the natural world; and develop the

self-directed need to be caring and preserve and respect the natural world and develop

lifestyles that will aid this position (Clinebell, 1996). Doing arts with and in nature

also helps to reach such goals of ecotherapy as to facilitate healing and accomplish

well-being as an inner state of wellness, including a physical, mental, and emotional

state of consonance that exists in a healthy environment and is based on a harmonious

connection with that ecology.

According to environmental psychology, meaningful action is the opportunity to

make a useful contribution to a genuine problem. It may involve being effective at a

large scale (e.g., the choice of livelihood, a life-long struggle for environmental justice

or food security), but perhaps more often it involves actions at a more modest level

Ecological/Nature-Assisted Arts Therapies and the Paradigm Change 41

(e.g., participating in a stewardship activity, community involvement, voting). The

meaningfulness experienced is less about the scale of the effort and more about deriving

a sense of making a difference, being listened to and respected, and feeling that we have

a secure place within our social group.

Reasonable behavior is more likely when people feel that they are needed and that

their participation matters. A number of studies indicate that doing something judged

worthwhile or making a difference in the long run are primary motives underlying

voluntary environmental stewardship behavior (Greese et al., 2000; Maller et al., 2006).

In these studies, the notion of meaningful action emerged as one of the most significant

sources of satisfaction.

One of the significant effects of doing arts with and in nature is that arts give

natural landscapes and objects some kind of “distinctive meaning, relevance and

status” (Sontag, 1990, p. 28). Doing arts as a form of environmental activity can help

people to recognize the meaningfulness and beauty of nature even if they initially did

not recognize such qualities. Following this idea, we can recognize that if the person

is focused even on the most depressed, sad, and colorless environment and starts

looking beneath the superficial exterior of things or places using arts she/he will often

see some spark of life, unique, individual aspects that characterize those objects or

places.

This necessarily requires however “turning ourselves inside out, with the heart as

the site of reconnection” (Chalquist, 2007) in order to be able to dissolve through “the

art of biophilia” (Kopytin, 2016) the psychological barriers that characterize the history

of our progressive alienation from the land and fuel the environmental crisis.

The arts help people to feel in control of the environment and participate in its

management and restoration. Art-making can be used to promote individuals’ and

communities’ active position in their relationship with the environment and develop

their perception of themselves as people who are able to exert a certain amount of

influence on it.

By being involved in environmental expressive/creative activities, people can

“personalize” and appropriate the environment. This can also be a significant factor in

their feeling safe and in control of the space they occupy. The controlling function of

the arts can be especially important in ecotherapy activities when the client perceives

the environment as lacking control (which is natural for most outdoor activities) and

evoking anxiety. The arts mediate one’s interaction with the space and help to provide

equilibrium between the dynamic quality of the natural environment and the more static

nature of artworks.

The active stance in clients’ relationship to nature is the main characteristic of

“contemporary ecotherapy” (Burls, 2007) and a significant factor of mutuality can

support collective behavioral change. According to Halpern et al. (2004), behavioral

interventions tend to be more successful where there is an equal relationship

between the influencer and the influenced and where both parties stand to gain

from the outcome (p. 25). In public mental health such mutuality can be seen in the

relationships between practitioners and service users, where the latter assume greater

responsibility.

Alexander Kopytin

For Burls (2007)

“In ecotherapeutic approaches, there seems to be a further level of mutuality:

the role of the influencer is adopted by people who would normally be

classed as the influenced. In benefiting from personal lifestyle changes

and associated recovery, the service users help to develop a framework

for reciprocity towards the environment and the community. In doing so,

the community is influenced to care for and respect the environment and,

in addition, to see their local green spaces as a source of health and well-

being” (p. 35).

The arts can be considered as a form of ecological personalization and subjectification.

Our perception of the constructive human interaction with the natural environment

through the arts can be enriched by concepts such as personalization of the environment

(Heimets, 1994; Laurence et al., 2013). This concept is related to psychosocial aspects

of a person’s experience, for example, their territoriality and need to maintain a sense

of belonging, ownership, and control over their space. Personalization can also be

understood as a human behavior that aims to express certain distinctive features of the

individual in their surrounding environment. Environmental arts can be understood as

an ecological form of personalization based on the empathic and supportive human

interaction with the natural world.

The expressive arts and acts of creative personalization of the environment can

promote an environmental ethic, and a more active and participatory position in

people’s relationship with the world around, as well as supporting their self-esteem and

empowerment.

Personalization of the environment and natural objects can also be considered as

subjectification, their being perceived as having their own subjectivity, able of thinking,

feeling, acting. Subjectification implied both empathy and identification with the

natural environment and plays a crucial role in the process of developing the human

relationship to the more-than-human world, and enables an ethical perception of nature

to be established.

Doing environmental arts supports mindfulness and a sense of physical presence in

the environment, connecting symbolic forms of the arts and language to the immediate

physical experience of the natural world (the life process). Some environmental arts-

based activities can be considered as a way of developing somatic awareness and

embodied sense of self in one’s relation to the environment. This effect is more obvious

as a result of environmental arts-based activities that balance time between mindfulness

and creative expression, when emphasis is placed on meditative journeys or path-

working (walkabouts) as a form of mini-pilgrimages in the “green area” accompanied

or followed with participants’ involvement in doing arts (drawing, taking photographs,

making environmental constructions, botanical arrangements, etc.). Other expressive

forms, such as dance and movement, rituals, music improvisation, and narrative-

construction in order to express and integrate complex experiences, can expand the

scope of expressive/creative arts therapeutic techniques.

Ecological/Nature-Assisted Arts Therapies and the Paradigm Change 43

Embodiment effects can be easily facilitated through mindful horticultural

activities, or meditative journeys in search for certain areas or objects in the

environment, followed with taking photographs or drawing the scenery or with

creating environmental art constructions like “green mandalas” or “homes in nature,”

etc. Through such assignments, participants become physically more active and

feel more embedment in the environment. Often, the projective nature of the arts

enables one’s identification with natural objects and environments on a physical

level and projecting one’s perception of the body or its parts onto natural processes

and environments. Through this process symbolization of somatic phenomena and

processes is possible.

Mindfulness-based arts therapeutic techniques can be integrated into ecotherapy

practices. In this way body–mind–environment focused activities can support the goals

of ecotherapy by fostering reconnection and returning to experiencing ourselves in the

here and now as an embodied being. This requires attention to physical sensations in their

relation to mind states evoked by one’s presence and interaction with the environment.

It should be emphasized that the curative powers of nature are enhanced by the degree

of mindfulness and mental focus one brings to these interactions. Participants can

immerse in “quiet fascination” (De Young, 2013, p. 103) and a state of presence in the

environment throughout different parts of the session. Participants can be encouraged

to use different arts and instrumental media like photography to explore experiential

awareness and practice mindful attention by documenting responses to sensory stimuli.

For instance, participants can be asked to take pictures of what they move toward as

pleasant and to also photograph what they experience as unpleasant as it was used

in new mindfulness-based art therapy intervention (Peterson, 2013), which can be an

example in a palliative environmental program.

Whichever particular expressive arts are being used, participants can be encouraged

to immerse themselves in a kind of meditation with their absorption in physical and

emotional processes, on the one hand, and being attentive to the environmental stimuli,

on the other hand. They can walk or act mindfully, keeping a sense of their presence

in the environment with immediate experience here and now and appreciating their

physical contact with the natural objects and sensory qualities of the “green space” with

its “field effects.”

Mindfulness-based environmental expressive arts therapies programs can include

an introduction with mindfulness instruction and emphasis on the role of attention

in health. Warming-up activities involving breathing and relaxation and exploratory

walkabouts in certain environments can be introduced as helping to provide deeper

effects (De Young, 2013; Linden and Grut, 2002).

Conclusion

Concluding my presentation, I would like to give my biggest piece of advice to arts

therapists who are looking to be more environmentally conscious and to integrate

nature into their practice. We as humans exist both in the mode of reality and in the

mode of possibility; we can choose to shape the world and ourselves in a way that is

Alexander Kopytin

not yet actual but that is contained potentially in what is already given. This ability is

our creative, poietic function, which means shaping the world around us, producing

different phenomena and “products” that either support or destroy the environment. We

can use our poietic function to move the world of more sustainable living for humans

and the more-than-human world from the realm of possibility to the realm of reality, but

this transition requires our creative imagination, intention, and activity together with the

living environment.

While our multicultural community is striving to go through this transition, nature-

assisted or ecological arts therapies can play a greater role in helping our clients and

societies to survive, be healthy, and form an affirming response to the constraints in

environmental and natural resources that are emerging now and that we will continue

to face in the future.

About the Author

Alexander Kopytin is a psychiatrist, psychotherapist, and professor in the Psychotherapy

Department at Northwest Medical I. Mechnokov University, the head of postgraduate

training in art therapy at the Academy of Postgraduate Pedagogical Training at St.

Petersburg, and the chair of the Russian Art Therapy Association. He introduced group

interactive art psychotherapy in 1996 and has since initiated, supported, and supervised

numerous art therapy projects dealing with different clinical and nonclinical populations

in Russia.

References

Burls, A. (2007). People and green spaces: Promoting public health and mental well-being through eco-

therapy. Journal of Public Mental Health, 6(3), 24–39.

Chalquist, C. (2007). The environmental crisis is a crisis of consciousness: Bringing the psychological

dimension into the discussion. Speech delivered at “Voices for Change,” organized by students at

Sonoma State University.

Clinebell, H. (1996). Ecotherapy: healing ourselves, healing the earth: A guide to ecologically grounded

personality theory, spirituality, therapy and education. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.

De Young, R. (2013). Environmental psychology overview. In S. R. Klein & A. H. Huffman (Eds.), Green

organizations: Driving change with IO psychology (pp. 17–33). New York: Routledge.

Greese, R. E., Kaplan, R., Ryan, R. L., & Buxton, J. (2000). Psychological benefits of volunteering in

stewardship programs. In P. H. Gobster & R. B. Hull (Eds.), Restoring nature: Perspectives from the

social sciences and humanities (pp. 265–280). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Laurence, G. A., Fried, Y., & Slowik, L. H. (2013). My space: A moderated mediation model of the effect of

architectural and experienced privacy and workspace personalization on emotional exhaustion at work.

Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 144–152.

Halpern, D., Bates, C., Mulgan, G., & Aldridge, S. (2004). Personal responsibility and changing behavior:

The state of knowledge and its implications for public policy. London: Cabinet Office.

Heimets, M. (1994). The phenomenon of personalization of the environment. Journal of Russian and East

European Psychology, 32(3), 24–32.

Kopytin, A. (2016). Green studio: Eco-perspective on the therapeutic setting in art therapy. In A. Kopytin &

M. Rugh (Eds.), Green studio: Nature and the arts in therapy (pp. 3–26). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science

Publishers.

Kopytin, A. (2020). The eco-humanities as a way of coordinating the natural and human being. Ecopoiesis:

Eco-Human Theory and Practice, 1(1), 6–16 [open access internet journal]. http://ecopoiesis.ru

Ecological/Nature-Assisted Arts Therapies and the Paradigm Change 45

Kopytin, A., Bockhorni, R., & Zhou, T. Y. (2019). From ikebana to botanical arranging: Artistic, therapeutic,

and spiritual alignment with nature. Creative Arts in Education and Therapy - Eastern and Western

Perspectives, 5(2), 96–105. http://caet.inspirees.com/caetojsjournals/index.php/caet/article/view/192

Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Levine, S. K. (1992). Poiesis: The language of psychology and the speech of the soul. Toronto: Palmerston

Press/Jessica Kingsley.

Levine, S. K. (2020). Ecopoiesis: Towards a poietic ecology. Ecopoiesis: Eco-Human Theory and Practice,

1(1), 17–24. – URL: http://ecopoiesis.ru

Linden, S., & Grut, J. (2002). The healing fields: Working with psychotherapy and nature to rebuild

shattered lives. Published in Association with the Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture.

London: Frances Lincoln.

Maller, C., Townsend, M., Pryor, A., Brown, P., & St. Leger, L. (2006). Healthy nature healthy people:

‘Contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion

International, 21, 45–54.

McNiff, S. (2015). Imagination in action. Secrets for unleashing creative expression. Boston and London:

Shambhala Publications.

Næss, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Næss, A. (2003). The deep ecology movement: Some philosophical aspects. In H. Rolston (Ed.),

Environmental Ethics (pp. 112–127). Oxford: Blackwell.

Peterson, C. (2013). Mindfulness-based art therapy: Applications for healing with cancer. In L. Rappaport

(Ed.), Mindfulness and the arts therapies: Theory and practice (pp. 64–80). London: Jessica Kingsley.

Roszak, T. (2001). The voice of the earth. Grand Rapids, MI: Phanes Press.

Sontag, S. (1990). On photography. New York: Straus and Giroux.