Le Simplegadi
Vol. XV-No. 17 November 2017
ISSN 1824-5226
DOI: 10.17456/SIMPLE-71
conclusion that this type of artificial environment has devastating effects on its inhabitants.
Dr Laing realises that “this was an environment built not for man, but for man’s absence”
(28) and Helen Wilder, points to the transformation undergone by the residents exclaiming
that “It’s almost as if these aren’t the people who really live here” (18). Helen is obsessed
with the idea that she and her children can be physically attacked at any time. Once more,
while leaning against the parapet on the roof deck, Dr Laing describes the landscape in front
of him as a projection of a psychic condition:
The cluster of auditorium roofs, curving roadway embankments and rectilinear cur-
tain walling formed an intriguing medley of geometries – less a habitable architecture, he
reflected, than the conscious diagram of a mysterious psychic event (28, my emphasis).
Previously, the skyline of the city of London, in its irregularity, had appeared as an
“unresolved mental crisis” as opposed to the reassuring geometrical perfection of the com-
plex. Now the futuristic architecture begins to appear unsuitable to human habitation and
mysterious. The high-rise increasingly comes to embody the dystopian realisation of an
architect’s experiment, functional on the paper but in fact detrimental to the vital necessities
of human beings, which imply cross-cultural exchanges, cross-class socialisation, cross-gen-
erational encounters, and contact with natural elements.
Confined in this technocratic paradise, the residents undergo a de-humanising process
which strips any trace of civilisation off them. Little by little any restraint is lost: altercations,
retaliations, raids, looting, clan-formation, acts of vandalism, illicit liaisons, incest, violence
of any kind are the norm. Ballard demonstrates that a hyper-technological development is
no guarantee of an equivalent evolutionary process in its human beneficiaries. In this anar-
chic context the building turns into a dysfunctional structure, showing the extreme frailty
of sophisticated mechanisms. Elevators and air conditioning are constantly out of order, the
garbage chutes are blocked and the disposal system gets soon overloaded. The result is a life
in extremely unhealthy conditions marked by suffocating heat, stagnation and miasma. In
a short time Architect Royal has to admit that the building is moribund. However, this does
not change his experimental attitude, which turns into a detached observation of the birth
of a new social and psychological order (or disorder) within the structure. The architect, de-
fined “a fallen angel” hovering over the residents (13) and a “lord of the manor” (100), is also
frequently described as a colonial figure, wearing a white safari-jacket and accompanied by
his Alsatian dog, an image recalling an imperial governor. It is no accident that the construc-
tion of the tower block is referred to by a resident as “an attempt to colonise the sky” (20): an
indirect criticism of a hyper-scientific and technologised attitude towards the environment
that has detrimental effects on humankind. The references to ruling figures of previous times
(the feudal “lord of the manor” and the colonial governor) seem to underline a regression in
patterns of political organisation. As in Concrete Island, the characters don’t leave their habitat
but adjust to it. Instincts are set free. New aggregations and hierarchies are formed. The high-
rise becomes an enclosed experimental microcosm of primitive regression.
Critics have often mentioned two major influences on Ballard’s fiction: his interest in
psychology and psychoanalysis (Freud, Jung and R. D. Laing) and surrealist painting (Dalì,
Della Valle. Ecopsychology in J. G. Ballard’s Fiction 260