Environ Health Prev Med (2010) 15:18–26
Fig. 10 Relationship between
POMS and physical
environmental factors in forest
area [38]
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
0
10000
R=0.66
20000 30000
Relative illumination (lux)
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
R=0.70
-6
50
60
70
80
90
Relative humidity (%)
25
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
-1.2
R=0.63
850 900 950 1000 1050
Atmospheric prssure (hPa)
depression subscale score and atmospheric pressure had a
significant correlation coefficient (R = 0.63).
When viewing a forest landscape, the low relative illu-
mination reduces anger, and the low relative humidity
lowers fatigue. Forests located at high elevations with low
atmospheric pressure can reduce depression. We hope that
these results can be used as basic guidelines in the design
of therapeutic forest environments [39].
Conclusion
The results of studies performed on the physiological
effects of Shinrin-yoku show that forest environments
could lower concentrations of cortisol, lower pulse rate,
lower blood pressure, increase parasympathetic nerve
activity, and lower sympathetic nerve activity compared
with city settings. The results of the physiological mea-
surements suggest that Shinrin-yoku can aid in effectively
relaxing the human body, and the psychological effects of
forest areas have been correlated with the various physical
environmental factors of forest. The studies of Shinrin-
yoku provide valuable insights into the relationship
between forests and human health.
These results of Shinrin-yoku studies will contribute to
support the development of a research field dedicated to
forest medicine, which may be used to develop new
strategies in preventive medicine. The results of the field
experiments also provide a platform for interested enter-
prises, universities, and local governments to promote the
effective use of forest resources in stress management,
health promotion, rehabilitation, and the prevention of
disease.
Acknowledgments This study was partly supported by a Grant-in-
Aid for Scientific Research (S: 16107007) from The Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT).
References
1. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson
M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban envi-
ronments. J Envir Psychol. 1991;11:201–30.
2. Frumkin H. Beyond toxicity: human health and the natural
environment. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(3):234–40.
3. Blood AJ, Zatorre RJ, Bermudez P, Evans AC. Emotional
responses to pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity
in paralimbic brain regions. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:382–7.
4. Buchanan TW, Lutz K, Mirzazade S, Specht K, Shah NJ, Zilles
K, et al. Recognition of emotional prosody and verbal compo-
nents of spoken language: an fMRI study. Cogn Brain Res.
2000;9:227–38.
5. Goel V, Dolan RJ. The functional anatomy of humor: segregating
cognitive and affective components. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:237–8.
6. Iidaka T, Omori M, Murata T, Kosaka H. Neural interaction of
the amygdala with the prefrontal and temporal cortices in the
processing of facial expressions as revealed by fMRI. J Cogn
Neurosci. 2001;13:1035–47.
7. Herzog AM, Black KA, Fountaine DJ, Knotts TR. Reflection and
attentional recovery as two distinctive benefits of restorative
environments. J Environ Psychol. 1997;17:165–70.
8. Kaplan R. Wilderness perception and psychological benefits: an
analysis of a continuing program. Leisure Sci. 1984;6(3):271–90.
9. Kaplan R. The nature of the view from home: psychological
benefits. Environ Behav. 2001;33(4):507–42.
10. Kaplan S, Talbot JF. Psychological benefits of a wilderness
experience. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF, editors. Human behavior
and the environment, vol 6 (Plenum Press, New York, 1983), pp.
163–203.
11. Kaplan S, Talbot JF. Psychological benefits of a wilderness
experience. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF, editors. Behavior and the
Natural Environment. New York: Plenum Press; 1983. p. 163–
203.
12. Talbot JF, Kaplan S. Perspective on wilderness: reexamining the
value of extended wilderness experiences. J Environ Psychol.
1986;6(3):177–88.
13. Park BJ, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T, Hirano H, Kagawa T, Sato
M, et al. Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the
atmosphere of the forest): using salivary cortisol and cerebral
activity as indicators. J Physiol Anthropol. 2007;26(2):123–8.
14. Editorial. Urban forest for human health and wellbeing. Urban
Forestry & Urban Greening. 2007;6:195–7.
15. Park BJ, Ishii H, Furuhashi S, Lee YS, Tsunetsugu Y, Morikawa
T, et al. Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the
atmosphere of the forest): (1) 1) using HRV as indicator (in
Japanese). Kanto J For Res. 2006;57:33–4.
16. Park BJ, Lee YS, Ishii H, Kasetani T, Toko A, Morikawa T, et al.
Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere
of the forest): (2) using salivary cortisol and s-IgA as indicators
(in Japanese). Kanto J For Res. 2006;57:37–8.
17. Park BJ, Tsunetsugu Y, Ishii H, Furuhashi S, Hirano H, Kagawa
T, et al. Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the
atmosphere of the forest) in a mixed forest in Shinano Town,
Japan. Scand J For Res. 2008;23:278–83.
18. Tsunetsugu Y, Park BJ, Ishii H, Fruhashi S, Lee YS, Morikawa T,
et al. Physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the
123